JUSTICE OF THE DAY TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER
In Times Of Lying, Truth Becomes A Revolutionary Act ... Rebeldia, Peace, Justice
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Dresses For 60 Dollars
... MERCANTILIUSMO PURE! PROGRESS
http://www.jornada.unam.mx / ultimas/2011/05/04/rechaza-scjn-conocer-amparos-de-sme-contra-extincion-de-lfc
Published 05/04/2011 16:31
Mexico City. The Supreme Court of Justice (SCJN) rejected the request made by former employees of the Mexican Electricians Union (SME) for the amparo filed against the extinction of Luz y Fuerza del Centro, with those who intended to leave no effect on the presidential decree of October 10, 2009.
The draft prepared by the Minister Fernando Franco, who proposed that the court knew the shelters, was rejected by his fellow Margarita Luna Ramos, Sergio Valls, Luis MarĂa Aguilar and Sergio Aguirre Anguiano. Franco
unsuccessfully raised The case, which involves thousands of workers who took refuge against his dismissal from Luz y Fuerza, was of "importance and legal significance" and it was important that the Supreme Court to intervene in its solution.
http://www.jornada.unam.mx / ultimas/2011/05/04/rechaza-scjn-conocer-amparos-de-sme-contra-extincion-de-lfc
Rejects SCJN electricians know protections against termination of LFC
Minister Franco unsuccessfully raised the matter was of importance and legal implications. Jesus Aranda
Published 05/04/2011 16:31
Mexico City. The Supreme Court of Justice (SCJN) rejected the request made by former employees of the Mexican Electricians Union (SME) for the amparo filed against the extinction of Luz y Fuerza del Centro, with those who intended to leave no effect on the presidential decree of October 10, 2009.
The draft prepared by the Minister Fernando Franco, who proposed that the court knew the shelters, was rejected by his fellow Margarita Luna Ramos, Sergio Valls, Luis MarĂa Aguilar and Sergio Aguirre Anguiano. Franco
unsuccessfully raised The case, which involves thousands of workers who took refuge against his dismissal from Luz y Fuerza, was of "importance and legal significance" and it was important that the Supreme Court to intervene in its solution.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)